Why are soft skills so much harder than “hard” skills?

In the evolving landscape of professional and personal development, the terms “soft skills” and “hard skills” seem misleading. At face value, “hard skills” refer to concrete, technical, or academic abilities that one can learn and measure with precision, such as coding in a specific language, solving a mathematical equation, or correctly answering a set of multiple-choice questions that test vocabulary. “Soft skills”, on the other hand, encompass the more intangible attributes like communication, teamwork, and emotional intelligence, which underpin successful interpersonal interactions and personal growth. Developing soft skills is an altogether different exercise, which requires both flexibility and structure. It requires a more nuanced understanding of performance measurement. It also requires, extending programs into the students personal lives and connecting with their personal values, in order to produce lasting positive change.

Defining Objectives and Wholistic Evaluation Methods

Technical skills often possess an objective clarity in terms of assessment. For instance, when it comes to coding, an individual either knows how to execute a command in a specific programming language or doesn’t; the output can be seen and tested, and the output either performs or it doesn’t. Soft skills, conversely, are nebulous, presenting a suite of challenges for educators and trainers when it comes to measurement and evaluation. To start, the objectives themselves must be defined (or re-defined) according to a wide variety of different contexts. Unlike hard skills where objectives are clearly predefined, soft skills objectives and standards often need tailoring depending on the classroom’s unique context. The combination of the teacher’s experience and expectations, students’ individual backgrounds and capacities, and overarching educational goals dictate which soft skills are prioritized. This means that from the vast sea of abstract soft skills – be it conflict resolution, critical thinking, adaptability, leadership, giving or following directions, or any other – service providers must first sift through, select, and then detail out clear objectives to enable any meaningful evaluation of student growth. This ‘progress evaluation challenge’ underscores the complexity of developing soft skills in any setting.

One approach to gauge soft skills is through self-reports. Individuals rate or describe their own abilities or behaviors, giving insight into their self-perception. While self-reports can be valuable, they come with obvious challenges. They can be influenced by biases, where individuals either overestimate or underestimate their competency, driven by the desire to present themselves in a favorable light or by a genuine lack of self-awareness. Despite these drawbacks, when used in conjunction with other methods, self-reports can provide a more holistic understanding of an individual’s soft skill competency. Certain kinds of self-reports can also be used as a learning exercise for students and a diagnostic tool for soft skills teachers. These tools can help program managers define lesson objectives in clear terms and gain some information on each student’s understanding of soft skills objectives.

Behavioral indicators serve as observable manifestations of soft skills. For instance, an individual’s ability to successfully mediate a group disagreement might be an indicator of their conflict-resolution skills. To effectively evaluate and develop behavioral soft skills, particularly social soft skills, educators must also design consistent evaluation methods. And these methods may need to be continually refined or adjusted according to the unique mix of students, the evaluation context, or different subjective evaluators. Performance scales can provide a spectrum on which these observed behaviors can be rated. Such scales also need ongoing refinement and adjustment. They need to be sensitive enough to capture growth and yet broad enough to allow for variability in performance. In short, they need to be meticulously crafted and refined to specific purposes in order to be consistent and effective.

Scroll to Top